Friday, March 4, 2011

Haunted and Rewarded by the Dead: Movie Review Of Los Secretos de Sus Ojos (The Secret in Their Eyes)



Wonderful performances by the three main characters, beautiful cinematography, and a haunting story that stuck with me for days afterwards: this is what I took away from this film.  The narrative had me gasping, crying, and retreating from the screen in all the right moments.  One horrific crime scene established a cursed, and sometimes even, a blessed life for the characters, showing us these effects over the course of 25 years.

Interwoven with flashbacks, full of life-altering decisions, and centered around one man's desire to obtain justice for the rape and death of an Argentinean woman, Los Secretos de Sus Ojos is a romantic drama pervaded with mystery, desire, obsession, and most significantly, love.

It is love that begins this story, and it is obsession and desire that brings an end to such a beautiful start.

The story takes place in today's Argentina with flashbacks to the country plunging towards dictatorship in the 1970s.  This political turmoil is only hinted at in various sequences in the film, and significance of the dead woman becomes known almost at once.

The main character, Benjamin, played by Ricardo Darín, is first introduced as a man facing writer's block.  The first scene begins with him writing his words down on a piece of paper, describing moments to us as the film itself plays out his words with him.


We see a woman and a man at a train station, giving each other a bittersweet farewell.  With Benjamin's words, we know this is a lover's meeting, and with the various close-ups on the character's face, we see their anguish.


And then we see and hear the first words of the film: "He ran to the end of the train and watched as her figure, once gigantic, now shrank in his eyes, but grew more than ever in his heart."


The story abruptly ends as Benjamin crumples up the page.


He tries once more.


Two lovers, but this time, two different people.  A man and his wife eating breakfast together.  Benjamin tells us the wife is making tea to soothe her husband's sore throat, and it will be his last time every tasting her jam.  The sunlight hits her cheek, almost as bright as her smile...


Benjamin crumples up the page and grunts in frustration.


Then...his eyes close...


We catch a disturbing scene of a violent rape.  Unable to see their faces, we cannot be sure of who these two people are, but it is clear that this is what will be central to the entire narrative.


Benjamin opens his eyes, and it begins.


Within minutes, we revisit Benjamin's past when we enter the office of the character Irene, played by Soledad Villamil.  It is learned that she and Benjamin were once colleagues, working together to solve the mystery of the rape and homicide case.  In flashbacks, we see a much younger Irene, desired by Benjamin and his alcoholic, yet endearing partner, Sandoval, played by Guillermo Francella.


Without having to say why, Benjamin tells Irene of his desire to write a novel on the case, and this is when we are presented with more and more flashbacks, giving us every detail of how and why this beautiful, mysterious woman was raped and murdered.  We are told of her name: Liliana Coloto.


After visiting the crime scene, Benjamin becomes obsessed with finding the murderer.  He, Irene, and Sandoval are forced to face 1.) a justice system that favors the rich over the poor 2.) their authoritative boss, and 3.) a prejudiced judge.  Together, the three work to find the true culprit of this crime, and in doing so, all form an unbreakable bond.


Provided with photo albums from the dead woman's husband (Ricardo Morales), Benjamin focuses on the (what I find the best way to describe him) creepiest man alive.  He is staring at Liliana, with a look that can only suggest obsession and desire.  


In the present, Benjamin tells Irene about looking at the pictures.  He admits that he knew right away Gomez was the killer.  He tells Irene, "Los ojos hablan."  "The eyes speak."  And it is here where we first catch a moment of intimacy between these two characters.  The eyes truly do hablan.


The film continues with periodical flashbacks that show the characters fighting through the clouds of mystery to find justice for Morales, who is forever heartbroken over the death of his wife.  In what will be a significant line to note, Morales, when talking of the death penalty, says that he is not in favor of it.  He wishes for Gomez to live a long, full, life, forever regretting the day that he murdered Liliana.  Death is not good, or in Morales' opinion, bad enough for such an awful crime.


The director and writer, Juan Jose Campanella, is truly an artist.  Various shots, particularly the continuous five-minute chase scene at the soccer stadium, had me in awe.  Not only was the atmosphere chaotic and hard to follow, but he had a way of focusing on the right spots at the right times, without one edit in the scene.  It was magic.


The performances by the three main characters are delightful, and the scenes between Benjamin and Irene are particularly beautiful.  In the flashbacks, we see hesitation and fear, and in the present, we see regret and love.  "Temo" versus "Te amo."  "I fear" versus "I love you" (another brilliant scene in the movie.)  You will know what I am talking about once you see it!


Campanella is a master at creating suspense and tension, but he is also highly talented at bringing in comical scenes at the right time.  It is mostly the character Sandoval that brings this lightheartedness to the film, what with his drunken stupor and beaming charisma, but we learn to love him more for his desire for justice and his loyalty to friends.  He was undoubtedly my favorite character in the film.


Los Secretos de Sus Ojos is a must-see, and while there were some minor disappointments, such as the disappearance of a climatic capture of the ultimate bad guy, it still touched my heart in a way that not many other films have.  My rating of "YAHT" would, on the normal scale, come out to be three stars.


Some may find the story slow and hard to stay focused on, but once one notes the brilliance of the performances and the use of cinematography in the film, it is quite hard to stay bored.


One will find themselves haunted by the dead girl in the story but will soon find out that it was from this death that love and justice found a way to prevail in a country full of political strife and violence.





       

  

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

2011 Oscar Nominations

As of right now, I know I have no followers, and I'm not really sure how to fix that, but I like writing to myself!  No problem!

This post is about the 2011 Oscar nominations and my opinion on them.  Before I continue, I feel I should share that I have not seen many of the nominated films.  I have created a list with my roommates, however, and am planning on seeing them all before the Oscars are aired.

These films are:
The Social Network
Rabbit Hole
Blue Valentine
Biutiful
Animal Kingdom
The Town


These are films from what I consider "the most important categories," which are Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress, Best Actor, Best Supporting Actress, and Best Supporting Actor.
Surprises within Best Picture category for me were The Kids Are All Right and Winter's Bone.

The Kids Are All Right was, funnily enough, just all right.  Many critics labeled this movie as a fresh take on lesbian relationships, but I found it highly unrealistic.  The couple was very stereotypical: there was the given "butch", Annette Bening's character, (her name was Nic; I mean -- come on!) who tended to be more aggressive with her children and seemed to have a much more feminist outlook on life.  The "mother" of the two, Julianne Moore's character (Jules), was kinder and more lenient on her children's behavior.  Also, she was the one who cheated on her wife with her sperm donor.

This, to me, made the film very disappointing.  I went in, looking forward to seeing a healthy relationship between two lesbian mothers, and instead, saw drama that takes place in any other films about dysfunctional families.  The thought that ran through my head when Mark Ruffalo's character (Paul) and Jules kissed for the first time was, "Wow.  How original.  Another movie about an unfaithful spouse."  Is it possible for there to be a movie about a lesbian couple without any typical Hollywood drama to ensue between the two?  I have not seen it yet.

The movie started with promise; Nic and Jules' kids, Joni and Laser, decide to contact the man who provided their mothers with sperm.  After getting more background information on Paul, viewers become interested on how this interaction is going to take place.

The first meeting is, as to be expected, awkward, but also, endearing.  I was excited to see what happened next.

However, what happened next was an introduction of the mothers to Paul, and the attraction between
Jules and Paul becomes evident.  This is when I lost interest.

I feel I cannot give the most secure criticism of Winter's Bone because I was very tired when watching it.  I fell asleep for maybe ten minutes.  That, obviously, makes the movie sound very boring, and to be honest, I was slightly bored.  However, I might need to give it a second chance because of how tired I was when first watching it.

As of right now, my favorite Best Picture nominee is The King's Speech.  In all honesty, it was one of the most beautiful movies I have seen in a while.  The cinematography, the writing, the acting, the story, etc. were phenomenal.  I wanted to see it again the moment I walked out of the theater.

The competitor of The King's Speech is clearly The Social Network, which I have not seen yet!  I just can't imagine anything better at this point!  I understand that if The Social Network won, it would be contemporary idea winning best picture, but I really hope that the decision is not purely based on that.  Because if that is the case, then the academy has no idea what it is doing.  Hopefully, I will see The Social Network soon and have an opinion on whether it is better than The King's Speech or not.  It is going to be tough to beat, though.

On to Best Director:

No big surprises in this category for me.  I saw many news articles with titles like, "What happened to Christopher Nolan?" or "Do the Oscars hate Christopher Nolan?"  I agree that he does not deserve to be nominated for best director, but I was pleased to see him in the category for best original screenplay.  Inception, worldwide, made  $823,576,195.  To see a director create a movie with that much success was nice to witness.  It was the first, significantly successful movie in a long time that was not based off of a well-known superhero, and it was not a remake of another big movie.  It was an original screenplay, and it took off!  That is why I am hoping Christopher Nolan wins best original screenplay because he created a new world and did a great job of putting it on screen.


My favorite director in the category is, again, Tom Hooper, the director of The King's Speech.  The movie was so well done, it kept me intrigued and at the edge of my seat the entire time.  Every scene and sequence was constructed in a way that kept the audience clinging to the actors' every words.  The cinematography was, in a word, exquisite.  There was not one part that I did not enjoy, and there was nothing I could complain about.  


However, I am happy with the entire list of directors.  I would be pleased if any of them won, especially the Coen brothers.  Their remake of True Grit really hit home for me, and they have always been a pleasure to watch.  They would be my next directors of choice to win the category.


Best Actress:


As mentioned before, I still need to watch Rabbit Hole and Blue Valentine, so I cannot remark on Nicole Kidman's or Michelle Williams' performances.  Nevertheless, I have liked them in every other movie they have been in.  I am sure they did fabulous in these movies!


As of right now, my favorite actress in the category is Jennifer Lawrence in Winter's Bone.  In my opinion, her performance was flawless.  What I valued most in her acting was that it seemed as if she wasn't really acting!  She was so comfortable in the environment and mixed with the other characters very well.  She was as strong and independent as a middle-aged woman, but she was portraying a mere 17-year-old girl who is forced to find her drug-dealer father and, at the same time, do all she can to keep her family intact.


It would be a pleasure to see Lawrence win because I think it would be unexpected.  It seems as if it is already decided that Natalie Portman is going to win best actress.  I would be pleased with this win as well, but I honestly do not believe that she gave the best performance as an ACTRESS.  She gave the best performance as a professional DANCER.  I know that she trained, lost weight, went through hell, etc. to become a dancer, but her actual acting in the movie seemed almost predictable and weak.  She really gave me no chills or surprise at any part in the movie.  Even when she transforms in the end, the editing and cinematography had more of an impact on me.  


That being said, I would be happier to see Portman win over Annette Bening.  I already gave my opinion about The Kids Are All Right above, and I was honestly shocked to see that Bening was nominated and Julianne Moore was not.  I love Annette Bening, don't get me wrong, but I thought she gave a mediocre performance.  She is a fantastic actress, and I put more blame on the screenplay of the movie than on her.  Moore was in the movie more (haha), and viewers got to see more depth in her character than Bening's.  I was surprised with her nomination and very surprised with the exclusion of Moore's.


Best Actor:


Colin Firth. Colin Firth.  Colin Firth.


What more could be said?


Well, actually...quite a lot.


His acting in The King's Speech left me speechless (get it?).  The stuttering must have been a struggle in itself, and it was so believable!  His performance left me frustrated, heartbroken, furious, and blissful all in one sitting.  


I have not seen Javier Bardem's or Jesse Eisenberg's performances yet, but after seeing Colin Firth, it really is hard to believe that anyone could be better.  He WAS his character; viewers could see his every thought and could feel his pain with every word he uttered that came out as a stutter.


The very first scene of the movie tugged at the audience's heart strings as his character, King George VI, gives a halting speech to all of England.  With each stutter, the microphone picks up every word, and it echoes throughout the entire stadium.  This happens over and over, and the people closest to him begin to exchange glances with one another.  Firth's face is fallen and utterly discouraged by this failure.  His mouth trembles with emotion, and his eyes are shining and wide.  The scene goes on for what seems like hours, and I began, without realizing it, to bite my cheek in anticipation.  Firth had me at his first stuttered word.


I have heard countless people predict that Jesse Eisenberg will win for best actor, and since I have not seen The Social Network yet, I can not disagree with this.  However, he has tough competition with Colin Firth.  Firth made me tear up over the course of the movie multiple times, and I found myself praying and hoping that he would be successful with his reign over England.  The connection between him and the other characters in the movie, especially with his speech therapist, Lionel (Geoffrey Rush), is fluid and incredibly realistic.  That factor, and even the obtrusiveness of certain objects used in the cinematography gave a feeling as if I were intruding in on his life.  He was hidden, literally and metaphorically, and through his performance, Colin Firth opened up tremendously to the characters acting with him and to the audience by the end of the movie.


Jeff Bridges was, as usual, great, and I really enjoyed James Franco's performance as well.  I would be happy to see any of these two win as well, but, in my opinion, none of these guys lived up to Colin Firth's performance.  In my eyes, he was perfect and deserves the oscar above the other nominees.


Best Supporting Actress:


The only nominee in this category that I have not seen is Jacki Weaver in Animal Kingdom.  Other than that, I have seen all the other actresses, and my favorite so far is Melissa Leo in The Fighter.


Surprises within this category were, Hallee Steinfeld and, sadly, Helena Bonham Carter.


I am not saying these two were not great in the movies they performed in!  I thought they were!  In Hallee Steinfeld's case, I was merely confused as to why she was not in the category for best actress.  The story focused on her the entire time, and she was the narrator throughout the film.  I am aware of how young she is, but it seems strange that she is up for best supporting actress, and Jeff Bridges is up for best actor.  


And I love Helena Bonham Carter!  I could never diss her as an actress.  Nevertheless, I thought her performance was not on par with the other actresses in the category.  To be honest, I forgot about her halfway through The King's Speech.  She did very well, no doubt about that, but she was overshadowed by the other people in the movie with her and the other nominees for best supporting actress.


I have never been a big Amy Adams fan, but I honestly wasn't surprised to see her nominated.  In fact, I think the only reason she was nominated for this performance was because it was the first movie she has been in where she isn't a meek, timid, and frightened young girl.  If it had been any other actress, I do not believe they would have been nominated.  She really did not bring much to The Fighter, other than a nice punch in one scene and an enemy to Melissa Leo's character.  


Melissa Leo was very natural in The Fighter.  She worked well as a conflicted mother, trying to make both of her sons as happy as the other.  She did wonderful in trying to seem indifferent to her son's (Christian Bale) crack addiction, and at the same time, showed us viewers how much it was tearing her apart.  There was one scene in which she feels betrayed by her family and starts throwing dishes at her husband.  She's shaking with rage, her face is red, and yet, she seems to be at the brink of tears.  At this point in the movie, I thought to myself, "She should win best supporting actress."  Each emotion she illustrated was done with ease, yet so much effort at the same time.  I would be very pleased to see her win the category.


Last, but not least, Best Supporting Actor:


The only movie in this category that I have not seen is The Town, but I heard Jeremy Renner did a fantastic job in it.  He was unbelievable in The Hurt Locker, and I am sure his performances just get better and better.


Who I believe deserves the win for this category is Christian Bale.  How he has never been nominated beforehand is a mystery to me!  After this performance, I am sure more and more nominations will keep coming, but this is the movie that he deserves to win for.  He was, undeniably, the best part of The Fighter.  The first scene it showed him, I knew, just by his expression, that he was a drug addict.


And from there, his portrayal of an addict and of a brother who simply loves his family was flawless.  When the film starts, his attitude seems to be one of apathy.  As a trainer, he words hard for his brother and does all he can to help him win.  Other than that, he does not care what his family thinks about his addiction and even jokes about it when he gets arrested.  However, this all changes when he sees a documentary of his addiction on television and witnesses his baby son crying as Bale's character gets hauled off to jail.  From there, his process of "getting clean" and fighting to get his brother in shape for fighting is full of unbelievable struggles, emotions, and obstacles to overcome.


On his first nomination ever, I believe that Christian Bale deserves the win for best supporting actor.


All the other nominees were fantastic as well, but Christian Bale was number one in my opinion.  


SO THERE WE HAVE IT!  Give me some feedback and your own opinions!  Sorry I cut this off pretty shortly, but I did not want to make this post too long.


Talk to you later!           










       




       

Friday, January 21, 2011

Newbie to the Max

Wow!  My first blog page ever!

I apologize to any person who comes across this page within my first couple posts.  I am, as the titles hints at, a "newbie to the max" at blogging.  However, I find it enthralling so far, so I have a feeling that I am doing the right thing in creating a profile for myself.

As many people who are close to me in life know -- I am a major movie lover.  Nothing sounds more enjoyable to me than sitting at home all day, watching movie after movie (with food and bathroom breaks, of course).  And I'll watch any type of movie, may it be mystery, foreign, film noir, action, drama, comedy, romance, and so on and so forth.  Everybody knows the Blockbuster category types for movies, so there is no need in repeating them.  (Looking back on my list now, I see that I have forgotten Family *gasp*)
 
There was a reason for creating this blog, I cannot lie.  I wish I could say that my creative juices were flowing one day, and I had this spontaneous urge to just share my witty ideas with the Internet viewers.  However, that is not the case.

Very recently, at my college, DePaul University, I have begun to take a class that is formally called "Film/Video Analysis."  Right off the bat, my teacher went through introductions, going around the room, asking about majors and favorite movies, etc.  (By the way, does any student like doing this?  It is so awkward!  My hands shake right before I have to speak, and I never know why because it's not that scary saying what major I am and how much I love the movie Stand By Me).  Anyway, she came to me and asked me what aspirations I have.  Many of the kids before me said things like, "Screenwriter!"  "Director!"  "Cinematographer!"  And I was thinking, "Uh, WOW, I"m definitely not cool enough for any of those jobs."  So when she got to me, I smiled and said, "You know, I've always thought about being a movie critic."

It was like I could hear the "Wa wa waaaaa" sad music play though the room (I hope people know what I'm talking about when I say this).  Her face fell, quite dramatically, and she said, attempting indifference, "People who want to be movie critics should go to graduate school and start a blog, otherwise...forget it."

Well, that's MY motivation!

My plan is, to anyone who cares, to analyze and critique a movie after viewing one in theaters or even on my roommate's Netflix!  My personal way of casually critiquing a movie is to exclaim "Yaht!" or "Naht!" while walking out of the theater to my car.  Don't worry; I will go more into my comments on the separate elements of the film so that people can begin to take me seriously on my quest to becoming a movie critic.  Take that, Professor!

I will make this short, since I really do not have many interesting things to talk about.  Once I start watching movies though, look OUT!  The opinions will be flying!  I cannot wait to begin, and I hope that many readers will choose to leave their own personal opinions and comments on what I have analyzed and noticed in the film.

Bon voyage!